|
2011 07 14 / FREEDOM & the
freedom clusters
2011 07 23 / B
io. to lead you have to be able to follow,
io to follow you have to be able to lead
as
io to be free, you have to free
yourself from freedom, from the urge to be free
that's gained by
the methodic of optimal reversity, of 180° / methodique
of opposition
that's what the Killing the Buddha means in buddhism
the freedom clusters :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FREEDOM -
UNCERTAINTY
FREEDOM -
BOREDOM - COWARDICE
FREEDOM -
BOREDOM - STRESS - CHALLENGE - FLOW
FREEDOM -
ADDICTION
FREEDOM - BLAME
2011 04 28 / B
if you cannot follow rules, don't
break them,
if you cannot break rules, don't follow them,
that's freedom in a nutshell
2011 08 02 / B
freedom is far more complex than multiple
choice, many people don't know the difference, in fact
engineers use both in exchange
2011 07 31 / B
everything not in the own tempo causes health
threatening stress - tempo / pace / sequence / serial
change - it disrupts own life pattern
thus change is causing stress, but not to change causes
degeneration, which in itself is also change,
change is the pattern of existence [statement,
explanation to act needed, also the -why-]
change is the pattern of existence cause stability is an
idea based on too slow, inexact, detouched observation,
repeat contains a margin of error, that's the margin of
freedom to deviate,
margin of error/freedom/tendency is the adaption to
action appearing in a space filled with not just one, the
own but several universes
certainty is the idea of escape/exit out of correctly
instable appearances within a multiversal space,
ideas too carry a margin of error
creation works, this or other way,
this way is mainly benevolent & cooperative, the
other way is mainly violent & desruptive
the margin of error is a signal zone of the change
between this & the other way
this way supports the past, the other way supports future
none of those ways is the better one per se, one has to
know when the one or the other is adequate
every thing is potentially poisonous, that's a fact
2011 07 27 / B
3. history of the idea of freedom
source
: etymonline / 2011 08 10 |
FREE
/ FREEDOM |
~1200 |
Free will |
~1390 |
Of nations, "not
subject to foreign rule or to despotism" |
|
|
~1500 |
Free speech in Britain used
of a privilege in Parliament since the time of
Henry VIII. |
~1580 |
Sense of "given without
cost" from notion of "free of
cost." |
~1690 |
Free and easy
"unrestrained" |
|
|
1822 |
Free love "sexual
liberation" |
1823 |
free trade |
1836 |
In U.S., as a civil right,
it became a prominent phrase in the debates over
the Gag Rule. |
1850 |
Free lunch, originally
offered in bars to draw in business, Amer.Eng. |
1850 |
Free pass on railways, etc. |
1890 |
Free enterprise |
1899 |
Free association in
psychology |
|
|
1950 |
Free world
"non-communist nations" |
1960 |
Free range (adj.) |
|
|
LIBERTY |
~1390
|
from O.Fr. liberté
"freedom,"
from L. libertatem (nom. libertas) "freedom,
condition of a freeman," from liber
"free" (see liberal) |
|
|
~1450 |
Sense of
"privileges" led to sense of "a
person's private land" |
|
|
~1620 |
To take liberties "go
beyond the bounds of propriety" |
|
|
~1700
|
yielded sense in England and
America of
"a district within a county but having its
own justice of the peace,"
and also "a district adjacent to a city and
in some degree under its municipal
jurisdiction"
(e.g. Northern Liberties of Philadelphia). |
1758 |
Nautical sense of
"leave of absence" |
|
|
1944 |
The spirit of liberty is the
spirit which is not too sure it is right.
[Learned Hand] |
|
|
LIBERTARIAN |
1789
|
"one who holds the
doctrine of free will" (opposed to
necessitarian),
from liberty (q.v.) on model of unitarian, etc. |
|
|
1878 |
Political sense of
"person advocating liberty in thought and
conduct". |
|
|
1971 |
U.S. Libertarian Party
founded in Colorado. |
|
|
|
|
2011 07 26 / B
again, equal what the situation is,
you can see yourself as victim or you can enable yourself
to chose to do things different,
that's change
i know that's hard, if it isn't then you don't change
really,
real change is really painful to perform, virtual &
often physiologic pain
& there are dangers, the dangers of illusionary
change,
just & only change based on inner freedom
is healthy
chosing responsibility usually doesn't feel empowering
cause we link responsibility to guilt,
but that's the only way to inner freedom
there are of course also those, who link responsibility
to power over others,
it's just diversion from the lack of power within oneself
for humans now is illusionary change the most dangerous,
cause illusionary change is same painful as real change,
to endure the pain of real change is reasonable, to
endure pains of illusionary change leads nowhere than to
a perpetual circle
illusionary change is what drugs cause,
addiction is the perpetual hope for an end or for
perpetual pleasure,
with any sort of drugs there is no end besides of death
& before the death appears, the life has been wasted*
everyone should have the right to waste the own life,
that's freedom even if it seems idiotic,
but not to know an alternative to a wasted life it's not
freedom but despair
inner freedom is won through the 180° methodic
*life is wasted on drugs/addiction, because
drugs offer a quick & promissing short term pleasure,
short term solution, alleviation of pain, sorrows,
problems
but in the long run, we lose years, decades, entire lives
over addiction to drugs
through thinking & orientating our lives just around
the next corner we miss what we could achieve
by dismissing short terms pleasures & concentrating
on goals requiring longer periods of focus
nevertheless, it's not the main goal or the most
important goal to achieve complicated long term projects
but one should be able to do so too, cause some of the
most important & rewarding projects are such bigger
tasks
2011 07 25 / B
reducing waste by any means up to 99% + 1% of
freedom/chaos
- currently we are at 50% waste = 50% chaos
[
2011 08 10 / B / website written (weblog)
we do not operate within a realm/space, which we
have won by being able to create it & thus being free
to be responsible for it
with ABILITY comes RESPONSIBILITY,
because ability means FREEDOM
waste & chaos result from creation out of ginnungagap
or transstructuration of smthng, which both work just by
being able to do so
waste & chaos are two sides of the same matter, the
same matter handled from two oppositional perspectives
waste is smthng left unused & thus invite others to
care for, those who will come may be benevolent, but they
mustn't
chaos is smthng, which is the primary soup of everything,
which comes before existence & thus is linked
directly with freedom,
chaos can be transformed just by freedom into existence,
based just on freedom
mostly we just don't realise how powerful we already are,
we think we are still very dependend & that thinking
creates constellations, in which we indeed are just
dependend & thus helpless
or we dismiss being responsible for the results of our
power
i know that it's correct being responsible if one has the
power
but it's not a question of morale or ethics, it's a
question of lost opportunities
responsibility is what guarantees acknowledgment &
the right to reign upon others, the right of leadership
the gain is an intern ability to reign correctly, to know
which works & which not in advance, it's a source of
self multiplicating power,
the spiral is upgrading, climbing, increasing, ascending,
spreading, enlarging, gaining
violence is the half way of both
no responsibility, but the taking of leadership
then violence is usurpatory power
but what does it mean at all ?
it's a screwed way to deal with power, it's simple
disfunctioning as the attempt to divide a magnet,
the result is a very strenous stressful life & not a
good one, one needs drugs to endure it,
the spiral is downgrading, falling, decreasing,
decending, falting, smallifying, loosing
in a world, which's rewarding easiest the violent &
the paternalistic leaders, may they be gross or subtle
violent, violence stays violence
the ways of right are not being rewarded at first but in
the end they must anyway, right is right
plain, simple [fr.simple/sampl-example]
FREEDOM FROM CONFLICT
undisturbed, unwrinkled, singular, free in decisions,
unbothered, independend
unclashing, unhindered, undisturbed, unmixed, in the own
speed, sequence, pace
free from violence, unviolent - unpeaceful, free from
peace - but rightful
RESPONSIBILITY = ABILITY TO A RESPONSE
ABILITY - RESPONSIBILITY - FREEDOM
VIOLENCE - RIGHT - PEACE
]
2011 07 17 / B
i usually don't let things stay unasked,
would i do it, then it would be garbage in my mind,
i don't like to rot from the inside out
different formulations same sense,
the many appearances of the same principle, therefore :
principle = sense | a pretty good explanation
you could ask :
if you dislike to rot from the inside out,
do you like to rot from the outside in ?
here my friend, i would answer, lies the freedom of the
other, of the differently thinking -
we have the right to destine ourselves, but
we have not the right to destine others, as
we have not the right to be destined by others
at this point you should ask :
why have we not the right to be destined by others ? not
the right to allow others to destine us ?
- ... - Susumu Hirasawa - Kikyu No
Mon from Millenium Actress | http://t.co/AODuBdy via
@youtube
yes, it is a very complicated
matter,
i don't talk here about indignados, indignation,
indignation is nothing but approval of paternalism by the
act of rejection, rebellion,
you should be aware of that
so, why have we not the right to allow others to destine
us ?
here splits the way between me & the world,
i have not this right because of the ways of the other,
not because of my own way,
it has to do with mysef beyond myself, which is clear
additional, the more powerful & influential i am, the
more responsibility i have to tackle,
it's really a very dificil matter / continue
[elaboration of FREEDOM matters]
2011 07 16 / B
freedom is the only answer to the being driven
danger, to that serious threat
2011 07 15 / B
just because we think, smthng we do is not
important
does it mean that it is actually, actually measured by
our reality
it's a mind map problem, the dubious(cloudy) part of it
is,
that we judge rejecting, dismissing(dimming)
we do not encounter, not relate, not engage,
we reject & that opposition, may it be violent or
silent
has to be taken suspicious
because we judge in favor to our current tendency &
thus
the tendency judges not the we, the journey judges, not
the traveller
ok, the traveller can decide to follow the way, but
that's again along my experience real tricky,
freedom of decision has to be approved
by the performed ability to change,
nothing else,
especially not the mere meaning of being able to change
can lift that duty
& every day is a new opportunity to prove it or to
fold
it's pretty simple, being correct, heading for
correctness is being couraged,
there is no goal, which is not reached by oneself &
to reach for a goal it takes courage,
that's the simplicity of it - courage of responsibility
from the beginning on until the goal is reached,
the exacter the project the easier to miss, but that's
already about ability, not the courage
sideline :
not to decide is a possibility not to miss, but sounds
like a fraud - what could be the constructivity in it :
ok, work spared, less energy +/-, not really the big
gainer,
freedom of bias, that could be, but one has to master it
finite & move on,
so one has -to decide- after one is -free not to decide-
still the same - FREEDOM
2011 07 06 / B
vipassana meditation trains to disconnect
Pavlov's reflex from stimulus,
it means not the absence of feedback response, but no
reAction
the absence of feedback response creates stupidity,
dumbness & irresponsibility,
the tendency towards inability to respond, numbness
different to that is
the ability of feedback but the willful direction of the
own action, what i call to have oneself in the own
hand
that's what Nietzsche & Aleister Crowley are about
[ABILITY-WILL]
2011 07 03 / B
Rosa Luxemburg : the freedom is the freedom of
those thinking differently
2011 07 02 / B
5. currently the PASSIVE TV CONSUMPTION is
moving from material world into the virtual web
would it be a battle, then we would be losing it, but it
doesn't feel like it when you haven't grown feeler for it
yet
can the own battles & the own war be won, although
the social battles & war are lost, i think, yes,
because of the freedom at the base
it's the stress caused by sellers, the pressure built,
the artificial smallification of the decision room
APPROVED by the targets
i never imagined (& of couse no one's gonna tell)
that the APPROVAL is more powerful than
the SEDUCTION, on the other hand
look it up, not that you are seduced by whomever, the
devil eg but that you give in makes crossing the line,
often there's no going back
your own approval makes the deal, but of course you can
always wheel the resposibility to the seducer |
http://t.co/Vm5YUiT
2011 06 26 / B
freedom is base of existence, without freedom
there's nothing
- netineti / Wikipedia : http://t.co/7xV9jJ9 - think
about for awhile
2011 06 24 / B
the basis for my work is the freedom of the
other, the free choice of the other,
be it the free choice to hope, even to perish unknowing
it
2011 06 14 / B
FREEDOM OF CHOICE, ALTERNATIVES
people have fun with money, money is like time, a social
activity,
money is materialized, time is just mind mapped, money is
an exchange, translation of one activity & it's
results into another activity
people have difficulties with the RATIO, the translation
between 2 such activities, which are within one ongoing
exchange,
there is dictating money & following money, the
dictating money's the denominator of money, the following
money's the numerator of money
potentially any money can be denominator, people who's
money isn't the denominator are not so happy about,
the results are that they have to follow other
denominators, then the value of their money is usually
lower than the ration of 1,
as far everything else in their surroundings' also,
there's no problem, but that ratio keeps them just within
their surroundings under 1
so why have people fun with money, cause people like to
exchange, to translate, cause they learn smthng new, the
alternatives
alternatives are good for people, they ensure freedom,
liberty - that's an aspect of money very simple & of
course unfulfilled explained
& that's also why any sort of MONOPOLY is a threat to
freedom, liberty, because of lack of alternatives, lack
of excape
it's better to have a very crappy sort of alternative to
a monopoly than JUST ONE BUT ONLY greatest monopoly ever
additional : alternatives make people think about better
ways, monopolies tend to make people dumb, it's about
qualities of mind maps
if there's one alternative, there can be more, if there's
just one & only monopoly, there is nothing else,
there is nothing but what is
it's a psychological barrier between the one TAO &
the 2 of heaven & earth & the myriad things of
the world,
the world has plenty of alternatives, we all are the
alternatives of one Tao
2011 06 10 / B
there is plenty of room for creation right
before the eyes of violent oppressors,
when freedom is understood as just illusionary phantasy
illusionary phantasy was, is & probably still will be
for a while
the best hiding place for those who cannot afford even to
hide
closed doors invite to break in
you have to be able to delegate,
just before you're doing it on your own,
that's freedom of survival
freedom happens not based on diversity but on organs
producing survival,
diversity's producing confusion & hope of being saved
???
2011 06 03 / B
rechecking the purity :
what is the purpose, the aim of your special, unique
movement, match the possible causes,
the only correct remaining cause has to be your senseless
will
- the base is absolute freedom, the addition is your
quality
2011 06 01 / B
gain is to get not big & fat beyond any
usefulness but
gain is to stay able to function without friction &
delay & producing exact the projected outcome no
matter the circumstances
that's also what distinguishes freedom from drug
addiction
2011 05 30 / B
a wide spread field of important
points is a future field, it's not a present field
but steps undertaken in the present, which do not contain
alternative actions but dangers of failure
block freedom of the future by the load of duty from the
past,
there is no such future & no such present, which
would be worth living - that's what iMatter is about
& that's what Greenpeace is about
those are not the only points of that very problem, it's
about Palestina, about Spain, about youth unemployment
& even about Arab Spring
in the earlier centuries people made war at such points,
Arab Spring & Palestina are still on that old brink,
but already Spain in not about war & Greenpeace is
surely not about war, as the Berlin Wall was not about
war & iMatter isn't
it's simply about a better future & not just the
return to a fine working past
2011 04 28 / B
if you cannot follow rules, don't
break them,
if you cannot break rules, don't follow them,
that's freedom in a nutshell
2011 04 25 / B
violence & freedom, the two points, the two
coin sides, both of the same quality, the same valency
- valance/violence - wolnos'c'/volatility
2011 04 09 / B
you cannot save someone, who's not fighting for
his rescue
as you cannot free someone, who's not sensing his slavery
2011 04 02 / B
i of course won't stop people to do, what they
want, even if i know that what they want is not what they
really need, i won't because ...
... the freedom is of a basic value, that value's
understood by those, who know the difference between
violence & order, tyranny & democracy
2011 03 22 / B
because while doing less we gain empty space
empty space means freedom, but not choice - to have
choices one has to have measurements
- suggestions is a haystack, but where's the needle
2011 03 11 / B
GOING ALL THE WAY
alles mitmachen, alles nutzen, was einem zur verfügung /
verführung gestellt wird
ab einer bestimmten menge kippt der nutzen der freiheit
hin zu einer last
dies ist die stunde der befreiung von der freiheit
ohne den verzicht auf die freiheit
dies ist die freiheit als ein instrument zu nehmen
& nicht mehr als die absolute erlösung
[STRESS]
- - -
you, who are placing yourself into a cell & you, who
place someone else into a cell
those are the two guilts
the guilt of a victim & the guilt of a vilain
those are not to be measured equal
the victim has the right to victimize himself
the vilain has first to discover himself as a victim
- io to master that, he has to stop to victimize others
there is no real victimization of others
there's just the tryout to shake off the own
victimization
by the victimization of others there's just the
prolongation of the own victimization
but what to do with the own victimization :
why is one victimizing onself :
my known best thesis regarding :
one victimizes onseself io to learn freedom
there's no freedom, where there's no need for freedom
[ADDICTION]
|